Archive for July, 2007

A day late and a dollar short (revisiting William Wilberforce - July 30)

Tuesday, July 31st, 2007

Yesterday was William Wilberforce’s feast day — the man who changed history. If interested, here are the readings. http://www.io.com/~kellywp/LesserFF/Jul/Wilber.html

In case it blew past you earlier this year, there is a movie out about him, which not only pertains to his perseverence to end the slave trade in England, but also highlights his animal advocacy. He helped found what became the RSPCA. This might be a movie worthy of an adult forum or two. (Well, if the Church really believes the words of the prayers that it publishes, then I think it is an obligation of the Church to find ways to inspire all church members to follow William Wilberforce’s example to “have grace to defend the poor, and maintain the cause of those who have no helper”.)

Here are a few things I just found again:

RSPCA

Best Friends

HSUS

HSUS Press Release

HSUS

article by Ingrid Newkirk

Amazing Grace movie site

Let your continual mercy, O Lord, kindle in your Church the never-failing gift of love, that,
following the example of your servant William Wilberforce, we may have grace to defend the poor,
and maintain the cause of those who have no helper; for the sake of him who gave his life for us, your Son our Savior Jesus Christ, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.

Amen.

(Collect from Lesser Feasts and Fasts — July 30)

Interfaith Animals & Religion planning retreat

Friday, July 27th, 2007

History was made today!

(Click here to read

“Faith leaders gather for retreat at Best Friends”.)

Do not remember the former things,
or consider the things of old.
I am about to do a new thing;
now it springs forth, do you not perceive it?
I will make a way in the wilderness
and rivers in the desert.

–Isaiah 43:18-19


“For the creation waits with eager longing

for the revealing of the children of God”
(Romans 8:19)

‘Go vegetarian to save money’ - MSN News

Thursday, July 26th, 2007

Read ‘Go vegetarian to save money’ here — good points on basic, inexpensive staples vs. things like veggie dogs, etc. Also good points health, health care savings, insurance, etc. along with a few links:

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SavingandDebt/SaveMoney/GoVegetarianToSaveMoney.aspx?vv=450


[Today's post bumped 'End of cheap-food era bad news for poor']

‘Bringing Moos and Oinks to the Food Debate’

Wednesday, July 25th, 2007

This article was mentioned to me today as one I should check out, and I found the URL for a couple of sources….

‘Bringing Moos and Oinks to the Food Debate’

New York Times under “Dining & Wine” —

or here:

International Herald Tribune under “Health & Science”

Thought it would be of interest to others, too.


[Today's post bumped 'Grow Trees, Not Cows' from the home page.]

Remembering my first friend and neighbor, Margaret Schlau

Saturday, July 21st, 2007

I posted this to one of my listservs first thing this morning, and a couple people liked it well enough that I decided to post it on my site too….

‘Living with ghosts’


[Today's post knocked 'Go Vegan to help climate, says government' (from The Telegraph, 30 May 2007) from the home page.

This article was added to the list of related URL's on that page:
"Meat is murder on the environment" from the July 18th issue of the "NewScientist".]

Take action against racism in this country!

Thursday, July 19th, 2007

Click here to listen to an NPR audio on the Jena case.

From Color of Change:

Justice for the Jena 6

The lives of six young black men are being ruined by Jim Crow justice in Jena, Louisiana.
The District Attorney has refused to protect the rights of Jena’s Black population and has turned the police and courts into instruments of intimidation and oppression.

We can help turn things around by making it a political liability for the authorities of Jena to continue the racist status quo, and by forcing the Governor of Louisiana to intervene.

Add your voice now!




KatrinaAction.org

Which Presidential candidate is most likely to care about issues important to animal people?

Monday, July 16th, 2007

Go to AR2007 (or at least their site) and find out.

Tonight is the last chance to register on-line for Animal Rights 2007. But you can still go. Click on the banner for info.

‘End of cheap-food era bad news for poor’

Saturday, July 14th, 2007

http://www.nugget.ca/webapp/sitepages/content.asp?contentid=605195&catname=Editorial&classif=">
End of cheap-food era bad news for poor

Gwynne Dyer
Editorial - Tuesday, July 10, 2007 @ 08:00

The era of cheap food is over. The price of corn (maize) has doubled in a year, and wheat futures are at their highest in a decade. The food price index in India has risen 11 per cent in one year, and in Mexico in January there were riots after the price of corn flour (used in making the staple food of the poor, tortillas) went up fourfold. Even in the developed countries food prices are going up, and they are not going to come down again.

Cheap food lasted for only 50 years. Before the Second World War most families in the developed countries spent a third or more of their income on food (as the poor majority in developing countries still do). But after the war a series of radical changes, from mechanization to the Green Revolution, raised agricultural productivity hugely and caused a long, steep fall in the real price of food. For the global middle class, it was the Good Old Days, with food taking only one-tenth of their income.

It will probably be back up to a quarter within a decade, and it may go much higher than that, because we are entering a period when three separate factors are converging to drive food prices up. The first is simply demand. Not only is the global population continuing to grow (about an extra Turkey or Vietnam every year), but as Asian economies race ahead more and more people in those populous countries are starting to eat significant amounts of meat.

Early this month, in its annual assessment of farming trends, the United Nations predicted that by 2016, less than 10 years from now, people in the developing countries will be eating 30 per cent more beef, 50 per cent more pig meat and 25 per cent more poultry. The animals will need a great deal of grain, and meeting that demand will require shifting huge amounts of grain-growing land from human to animal consumption - so the price of grain and of meat will both go up.

The global poor don’t care about the price of meat, because they can’t afford it even now - but if the price of grain goes up, some of them will starve. And maybe they won’t have to wait until 2016, because the mania for “bio-fuels” is shifting huge amounts of land out of food production. One-sixth of all the grain grown in the United States this year will be “industrial corn” destined to be converted into ethanol and burned in cars, and Europe, Brazil and China are all heading in the same direction.

The attraction of bio-fuels for politicians is obvious: They can claim that they are doing something useful to combat emissions and global warming (though the claims are deeply suspect), without actually demanding any sacrifices from business or the voters. The amount of U.S. farmland devoted to bio-fuels grew by 48 per cent in the last year alone, and hardly any new land was brought under the plow to replace the lost food production. In other big bio-fuel producing countries like China and Brazil it’s the same straight switch from food to fuel. In fact, the food market and the energy market are becoming closely linked, which is bad news for the poor. As oil prices rise (and the rapid economic growth in Asia guarantees that they will), they pull up the price of bio-fuels as well, and it gets even more attractive for farmers to switch from food to fuel. Nor will politics save the day. As economist Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute told the U.S. Congress last month: “The stage is now set for direct competition for grain between the 800 million people who own automobiles, and the world’s two billion poorest people.” Guess who wins.

Soaring Asian demand and bio-fuels mean expensive food now and in the near future, but then it gets worse. Global warming hits crop yields, but only recently has anybody quantified how hard. The answer, published in Environmental Research Letters in March by Christopher Field of the Carnegie Institution in Stanford, Calif., and David Lobell of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, is quite simple: for every 0.5 C hotter, crop yields fall between three and five per cent. So 2 C hotter, the lower end of the range of predicted temperature rise in this century, means a 12 to 20 per cent fall in global food production.

This is science, of course, so that answer could be wrong - but it could be wrong by being too conservative. Last year in New Delhi, I interviewed the director of a think tank who had just completed a contract to estimate the impact on Indian food production of a rise of just two degrees C in global temperature. The answer, at least for India, was 25 per cent. That would mean mass starvation, for if India were in that situation, every other major food-producing country would be too, and there would be no imports available at any price.

In the early stages of this process, higher food prices will help millions of farmers who have been scraping along on poor returns for their effort because political power lies in the cities, but later it gets uglier. The price of food relative to average income is heading for levels that have not been seen since the early 19th century, and it will not come down again in our lifetimes.

Gwynne Dyer’s new book, The Mess They Made: The Middle East After Iraq, was published in Canada recently by McClelland and Stewart.

Grow Trees, Not Cows

Friday, July 13th, 2007

from: http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=38371

NICARAGUA: Plant Trees, Harvest Water
By JosÈ Ad·n Silva

MANAGUA, Jun 29 (IPS) - More than six years ago, the residents of the rural community of Lomas del Viento, on Nicaragua’s Pacific coast, took up the task of recuperating the 10 flowing springs that were drying up as a result of logging in the surrounding forests. And they succeeded.

Lomas del Viento is a 200-year-old village of small farmers in the hills 22 kilometres south of Santa Teresa municipality in the south-western department of Carazo.

The area was always forested, with mountains filled with a variety of plants and animals and abundant springs and rivers. But about 12 years ago everything began to change.

Little by little, the farmers began taking over the forests in the hills, and burning off the vegetation to clear the land to plant grains, MarÌa Margarita Carmona, who was born in the area, told TierramÈrica.

Other families, faced with poverty and the impossibility of obtaining loans to improve their farms, sold their land to livestock and logging companies, who extracted the valuable lumber and cleared the land for cattle, she said.

“We were scared when the rivers began to dry up and we had to travel kilometres up the mountains to get water,” said Carmona.

Of the 10 springs that quenched the thirst of many generations in Lomas del Viento, by 2001 only two were available to the 40 families living in the area, community leader Marcial UmaÒa told TierramÈrica.

The other eight had dried up and were filled with rubble from the construction of a highway to carry tourists to the Chacocente wildlife refuge on the Pacific beaches.

“People began to worry because every day it was more difficult to find water and there was very little rain. We had to climb the hills to look for water in the wells, but almost none of them had any,” recalled UmaÒa.

Faced with this crisis, a community committee asked for help from the Santa Teresa municipal government to build a well, he added.

The local government had no resources but did have information that led them to the non-governmental organisation Tierra y Vida (Land and Life).

According to Reinerio Mongalo, a technician with Tierra y Vida, a team of experts made three discoveries in Lomas del Viento: its tourism potential, the flow of water in layers deep underground, and — the most worrisome — a rate of environmental destruction that would soon leave the hillsides usable only for livestock.

Either change the methods of agricultural production, or say good-bye to the last forests and rivers, the experts said.

“The people were shocked by that choice. It is difficult to accept the disappearance of all the forests where you grew up, those giant trees and roaring rivers,” Marcial J·enz, a young man who now administers the Lomas del Viento community tourism project, told TierramÈrica.

After receiving the warning, the Lomas del Viento Cooperative of Community Tourism was organised.

Of the area’s 40 families, half immediately joined the project and began to apply the environmental management plans; they no longer burned off fields and they replaced chemical pesticides with organic farming techniques.

The other 20 families took the wait-and-see approach, and promised to join the effort once they saw that it works.

While some of the locals involved in the cooperative have planted 20,000 trees in areas destroyed by logging, others cleaned out the springs, reforested the watersheds with local plants.

After six years, the community has seen the eight springs once filled with mud and garbage now produce water.

The giant trees they managed to preserve have seen the return of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) and bird species that had disappeared from the area years ago. No longer are there dark clouds of smoke from the annual burnings of fields in preparation for planting.

Since the official launch of the rural tourism project 16 months ago, 1,560 visitors from within Nicaragua and abroad have hiked the hills and have seen the miraculous resurgence of the crystalline waters.

This year the Health Ministry certified that the water coming from Lomas del Viento’s springs is suitable for human consumption.

But not all of Nicaragua’s rural communities have had such an opportunity. In May, a study by the non-governmental Alexander von Humboldt Centre found that 70 percent of the country’s surface water sources are contaminated by household and industrial waste.

The Human Development Report for Nicaragua, presented this month by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), states that more than 70 percent of Nicaragua’s five million people lack access to potable water.

The National Potable Water and Sanitation Commission recognised in an August 2006 document that only a quarter of Nicaraguan families had access to clean water.

This Central American country will have to ensure safe water and sanitation services to at least 2.5 million people before 2015 if it is to meet its target under the eight Millennium Development Goals, adopted by the international community in 2000.

In Latin America there are some 100 million people who live without any sanitation services and 50 million without potable water. Worldwide, there are more than one billion people who lack safe water for drinking, according to the United Nations.

(*Originally published by Latin American newspapers that are part of the TierramÈrica network. TierramÈrica is a specialised news service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.)

(END/2007)

‘Go vegan to help climate, says Government’ (from The Telegraph, 30 May 2007)

Sunday, July 8th, 2007

“Adopting a vegan diet dramatically reduces one person’s impact on the environment”

The following article from the 30 May 2007 issue of “The Telegraph” was brought to my attention today. I’m copying the whole thing in case they remove the article from their website:

Go vegan to help climate, says Government
By Charles Clover, Environment Editor
Last Updated: 12:01amBST30/05/2007

It would help tackle the problem of climate change if people ate less meat, according to a Government agency.

A leaked email to a vegetarian campaign group from an Environment Agency official expresses sympathy with the environmental benefits of a vegan diet, which bans dairy products and fish.

The agency also says the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is considering recommending eating less meat as one of the “key environmental behaviour changes” needed to save the planet.

It says that this change would have to be introduced “gently” because of “the risk of alienating the public”.

David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, has raised the issue that farm animals are blamed for producing large amounts of the powerful greenhouse gas, methane, and told farmers they need to do something about it but the agency’s response appears to go further than official advice.

It has provoked an immediate response from the National Farmers’ Union, which said the suggestion was “simplistic” and “a cause of concern”.

The agency’s official was responding to an email from the vegan group Viva, which argues that it is more efficient to use land to grow crops for direct consumption by humans rather than feeding them to dairy cows or livestock raised for meat.

The campaign group entered a comment on the Environment Agency’s website saying: “Adopting a vegan diet reduces one person’s impact on the environment even more than giving up their car or forgoing several plane trips a year! Why aren’t you promoting this message as part of your [World Environment Day] campaign?”

An agency official replied: “Whilst potential benefit of a vegan diet in terms of climate impact could be very significant, encouraging the public to take a lifestyle decision as substantial as becoming vegan would be a request few are likely to take up.

“You will be interested to hear that the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs is working on a set of key environmental behaviour changes to mitigate climate change. Consumption of animal protein has been highlighted within that work. As a result the issue may start to figure in climate change communications in the future. It will be a case of introducing this gently as there is a risk of alienating the public majority.

“Future Environment Agency communications are unlikely to ever suggest adopting a fully vegan lifestyle, but certainly encouraging people to examine their consumption of animal protein could be a key message.”

Juliet Gellatley, director of Viva, said: “I think it is extraordinary that a Government agency thinks becoming a vegetarian or vegan could have such a positive impact for the environment yet it is not prepared to stand up and argue the case.”

A Defra spokesman said: “The Government is not telling people to give up meat. It isn’t the role of Government to enforce a dietary or lifestyle change on any individual.”


Here are a few links to topics related to topics of world hunger and/or Global Warming:

- Please click here to visit my updated page of charities and organizations that help people without exploiting animals.
- ‘Veganism, World Hunger, Least Harm’
- ‘Plant-based Hunger Solutions: common sense food policy for a healthy well-fed world’
- “Livestock gift charities do not help poor nations, say global critics”
- “The grass on the other side… (from Viva’s site)
- World Watch feature on meat, and related topics, along with downloadable report: “Meat: Now, It’s Not Personal! But like it or not, meat-eating is becoming a problem for everyone on the planet”
- ABC News: Meat-Eaters Aiding Global Warming?
New Research Suggests What You Eat as Important as What You Drive
- ‘Meat is murder on the environment’, from the 7/18/07 issue of “NewScientist”

“Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day,
Teach a woman to garden and she will feed her family for ever.”