‘Too Radical for PETA’
Tuesday, January 29th, 2008I was Googling for PETA and Christianity, and found this old article: ‘Too Radical for PETA’
I weigh in somewhere in the middle, glad that PETA gave up their “Jesus was a vegetarian” campaign, mainly for general credibility’s sake among other things, but not agreeing that by dropping that, it hurts the case for ethical vegetarianism. I don’t know what Jesus’ eating habits were. I read that there is only one account in the Bible of him eating a piece of fish after the Resurrection, I asssume, to prove that he was really alive. (Everything else about his diet is based on assumptions due to associations with his fisher friends or pervasive religious traditions, or projections, but not explicitly written in the Bible, and probably not provable one way or another. I could say more, but won’t.) But my argument is that whether or not he was a vegetarian, he lived in a very different time where they didn’t have the choices we have, and where animal suffering wasn’t as pervasive as it is today. (And I believe that the Jews had, and have, a more humane ethic toward animals than anything that got passed along to us Christians. As one example, why do Christians think it’s OK to hunt for sport, when Jews do not?) Anyway, I did find the last three paragraphs of the article compelling. And it behooves Christians, whether or not they take animal rights people seriously, or whether they want to build Bible studies to “debunk” animal rights from a Christian perspective, to examine what kind of message they send to the world. When it comes to our treatment of animals, Christianity really needs to take a humane approach, if it doesn’t want to come off as hypocritical, self-serving and the cruelest of the world’s religions. It’s an evangelism issue, as well as one of self-examination, to find out what truly motivates Christians to justify their favorite forms of animal exploitation on religious grounds. How does animal exploitation serve the cause of Christ?
Here’s the last part of the article:
Youíd have to be blind not to see that Christianity is in a major crisis over what, exactly, its tradition means. Some people seem to think that Christianity is a license to wage aggressive war in the Middle East, preach intolerance of othersí beliefs, persecute homosexuals, and insist on the literal interpretation of the Bible (whatever THAT means). Can we remain neutral in this conflict and just let them fight it out among themselves, while promoting vegetarianism to whichever Christians will listen? I donít think that anyone who cares about Christianity and is aware of these other issues will want to do this.
Why is this predominantly “Christian” nation also the wealthiest and has the biggest military in the world? Isnít real Christianity about simple living and nonviolence? Shouldnít we talk about getting rid of our consumer culture, about stopping aggressive war, about reversing our “car culture,” about changing our lives, about changing our society and our world? Donít we need to completely re-examine Christianity, and isnít vegetarianism just part of this?
Rethinking the whole Christian tradition, and taking the gospel message seriously, is so much more than vegetarianism, even ethical vegetarianism. But this “so much more” is not just a cranky sectarian left-wing viewpoint. It is in fact the message of Jesus ó precisely what both the world at large, and Christianity in particular, now urgently requires.
It is a message which is also, alas, too radical for PETA.
– Keith Akers





